CATEGORIA • 17 NOV, 2025
CATEGORIA • 17 NOV, 2025
CATEGORIA • 17 NOV, 2025
CATEGORIA • 17 NOV, 2025
CATEGORIA • 17 NOV, 2025
There was a particular kind of article that flourished during the traditional SEO era.
You know the one.
You search for something painfully simple like “how long should I boil an egg?” and somehow find yourself halfway through a 1,700-word article explaining the history of breakfast.
The answer exists somewhere. The page just really wants you to work for it.
Businesses created enormous libraries of this kind of content because every search query represented a potential doorway into the website. If enough people searched for something adjacent to your industry, there was an argument for publishing an article about it.
Generative AI has made that strategy vulnerable from two directions.
First, AI can answer many simple informational questions without requiring the user to visit the source at all.
Second, AI has made generic content extraordinarily cheap to produce.
If anyone can generate a competent article about “10 benefits of content marketing” in thirty seconds, publishing another competent article about the same subject doesn’t create much of an advantage.
The internet doesn’t have a shortage of information anymore.
It has a shortage of information worth choosing.
That distinction is going to matter enormously.
I use AI in marketing, and I think refusing to use it simply because it can produce bad work is a little like refusing to use Photoshop because terrible graphic design exists.
The technology isn’t the interesting part by itself. What matters is what someone capable can do with it.
AI can dramatically accelerate research, help organize information, analyze large amounts of data, explore ideas, repurpose material and remove an absurd amount of repetitive work from the content production process.
That’s valuable.
But efficiency creates its own problem.
When everyone becomes capable of producing more content, producing more content stops being particularly impressive.
If ten competitors used to publish four articles a month and can now publish forty, the competitive advantage doesn’t belong to whoever discovers the “generate” button first. The internet simply ends up with 360 additional articles competing for the same attention.
So the scarce resource shifts.
Original experience becomes more valuable. Proprietary data becomes more valuable. Good analysis becomes more valuable. A recognizable point of view becomes more valuable. Expertise that comes from actually doing the work becomes more valuable.
And perhaps most importantly, trust becomes more valuable.
AI can reproduce information remarkably well. It cannot retroactively give a company ten years of experience, create customer relationships that never happened or manufacture proprietary insights from work nobody actually did.
The brands that understand this will use AI to increase the leverage of human expertise rather than trying to replace expertise with generated volume.
One of the more confusing changes marketers will have to adapt to is that traffic may become a less complete measure of organic visibility.
For years, the logic was comfortable: if SEO was working, organic traffic should increase.
AI-generated answers introduce situations in which your information can influence someone’s decision without producing a visit at that particular moment.
A person might encounter your company in an AI-generated comparison, see your research cited in an answer or repeatedly hear your brand mentioned while researching a category. They may only visit your website much later, perhaps through a branded search or direct visit.
From an analytics perspective, some of the journey disappears.
From the customer’s perspective, nothing disappeared at all. They were simply doing research somewhere else.
This makes attribution considerably messier.
A company could theoretically become more influential in its category while seeing fewer informational clicks because the information itself is being consumed through search interfaces and AI assistants.
That doesn’t mean traffic stops mattering. Websites remain extraordinarily important, especially as customers move closer to evaluating, trusting and purchasing from a business.
But marketers will have to become more comfortable distinguishing between traffic and influence.
The two used to overlap much more neatly than they may in the future.
The traditional marketing funnel was never as tidy as the diagrams made it look, but AI is making that especially obvious.
Customers can now outsource significant portions of their research.
Someone evaluating accounting software can ask an AI assistant to explain the category, identify suitable vendors, compare pricing, summarize reviews, list potential drawbacks and suggest questions to ask during a demo.
By the time that person reaches a company’s website, they may know considerably more than the average visitor did five years ago.
That changes what the website needs to do.
If someone already understands the basic category, repeating introductory information isn’t particularly helpful. They may be looking for evidence, differentiation, implementation details, pricing, integrations, customer stories or reassurance that the product actually fits their specific situation.
In that sense, AI doesn’t necessarily remove the company from the buying journey. It can change the point at which the company enters it.
This has implications far beyond SEO.
Content strategy, brand positioning, product marketing, paid acquisition, sales enablement and customer experience all become part of the same discoverability problem.
If AI introduces someone to your company, what will they find when they investigate further?
And will what they find reinforce the recommendation?
There’s an irony in all of this.
The more capable AI becomes at organizing information, the more important I think brand becomes.
When everyone can explain the same concept, publish the same basic information and create reasonably polished content at almost no cost, information itself becomes less differentiating.
People still need reasons to choose.
They choose companies they recognize, experts they trust, products people they respect recommend and brands associated with particular ideas or outcomes.
This matters for AI discovery too.
A company doesn’t become authoritative simply by publishing 500 AI-generated articles saying that it is.
Authority accumulates through a much broader ecosystem: original research, credible mentions, customer experiences, reviews, expert contributions, links, discussions, partnerships, media coverage and consistent association between a brand and a particular subject.
In traditional marketing language, some of that belongs to SEO, some to PR, some to content, some to brand and some to customer experience.
AI doesn’t particularly care about our departmental boundaries.
It encounters the information those activities leave behind.
That means companies thinking seriously about AI-era acquisition will eventually have to think beyond optimizing individual pages and start considering the broader information environment surrounding their brand.
I wouldn’t respond to AI search by throwing away everything we know about SEO and chasing whatever acronym happens to be fashionable this month.
Most of the fundamentals still make sense.
Understand what your customers are trying to accomplish. Build pages that clearly explain your products and services. Create technically accessible websites. Develop genuine topical expertise. Earn credible mentions and links. Answer real customer questions. Publish information worth referencing.
What changes is the context around those fundamentals.
Keyword research, for example, remains useful, but it shouldn’t be the entire content strategy. People increasingly express needs conversationally, with far more context than a two-word search query can capture. That makes understanding customer problems, questions and decision criteria even more important.
Content should also become more explicit where clarity matters. If your company serves a particular type of customer, say so. If your product solves a specific problem, explain how. If you have data supporting a claim, make the evidence accessible. If customers repeatedly ask the same question during sales conversations, the answer probably belongs somewhere search engines and AI systems can find it.
At the same time, I would invest much more heavily in content that cannot be reproduced simply by asking an AI model to “write an article about X.”
Show the work.
Publish what you learned from customers. Explain decisions you’ve made. Share experiments, failures, proprietary data, case studies and opinions grounded in experience. Bring subject-matter experts into the content instead of hiding them behind a generic corporate voice.
AI can help you turn that knowledge into content.
It shouldn’t be the source of the knowledge.
It’s tempting to frame all of this as another search update because marketers know how to respond to those. Google changes something, rankings move, everyone publishes predictions and eventually we adjust.
I think AI represents a broader change.
It is altering how people interact with information itself.
The old internet often asked us to find information, open it, evaluate it and synthesize it ourselves. AI increasingly performs some of that work between the source and the person looking for an answer.
That intermediary layer changes what it means to be discovered.
Businesses still need websites. They still need search visibility. They still need content, authority, links, brand awareness and all the boring technical foundations that have always made digital acquisition work.
But they also need to consider whether machines can understand who they are, whether their expertise is represented clearly enough to be retrieved and whether the wider web gives those systems reasons to trust what the company says about itself.
The future of SEO probably isn’t choosing between optimizing for Google and optimizing for AI.
Search engines themselves are becoming AI products, while AI assistants increasingly behave like search engines whenever they need current information.
The boundaries are already getting blurry.
So I wouldn’t build an “AI SEO strategy” in isolation. I’d build a discoverability strategy capable of surviving whichever interface happens to sit between the customer and the information next.
Because customers will continue asking questions.
They’ll continue researching products, comparing options and looking for businesses capable of solving their problems.
What’s changing is who, or what, helps them decide where to look.
And if AI becomes part of that decision, being easy to find will no longer be enough.
You also need to be worth recommending.
If you came here hoping for a universal winner, I’m afraid social media is annoyingly dependent on context.
I wouldn’t choose LinkedIn because the company is B2B, Instagram because the product looks nice or TikTok because younger audiences use it. Those can be useful clues, but they are not strategies.
I’d start by understanding who needs to know the brand exists, what needs to happen in their mind before they are willing to buy and where social media can realistically influence that process. Then I’d look at how those people behave across platforms, what kind of content earns their attention there and whether the company has the resources and expertise to participate consistently without turning content production into an organizational burden.
Sometimes that analysis leads clearly to LinkedIn. Sometimes Instagram or TikTok makes considerably more sense, and sometimes the answer is a combination in which each platform performs a different job.
The important part is that the decision comes from the business rather than from the platform.
Social networks will continue changing, algorithms will continue being rewritten and whatever format marketers are currently obsessed with will eventually be replaced by another one. Building a strategy around those changes means constantly chasing the internet.
Your customers are a much better place to start.
Find where they willingly give their attention, understand what they want while they’re there and create something worth giving that attention to.
The right platform usually becomes much easier to see after that.